Fueled by viral TikTok trends and a growing 'looksmaxxing' subculture, women are increasingly paying for facial analysis scans that promise data-driven guidance on which cosmetic procedures to pursue. Services such as Qoves charge hundreds of dollars for detailed reports based on user-submitted selfies, marketed as scientifically grounded pathways to a 'glow-up.'
The appeal is especially acute for those facing economic or emotional hardship. The Guardian report features Danielle, 37, a former model whose two years of unemployment eroded her confidence. 'It was easy to wonder, if I was prettier, if some of my features were different, would that help?' she said. After seeing TikTok videos advertising 'science-backed' advice, she spent $330 and received a personalized 30-page report from Qoves.
Experts cited in the coverage warn these services are not backed by science and can be harmful to users, framing aesthetic insecurity as a solvable problem through procedures. The result is an unregulated industry selling medical-adjacent recommendations to users often already under financial or psychological stress.