Meta's smart glasses are running into a wall of public distrust, framed by critics not as sleek wearables but as 'pervert glasses' that enable silent, non-consensual recording in everyday spaces. 'Most people don't want pervert glasses that can film us without our consent,' said a spokesperson from activist group Everyone Hates Elon, capturing wider fears that the devices normalize surveillance and harassment in public life.
Campaigners are turning to both culture and law. Everyone Hates Elon has launched a series of guerrilla adverts deriding non-consensual filming by the glasses, alongside an email campaign encouraging people to legally object to being filmed under general data protection regulations — a push that has already drawn more than 20,000 signatories. Rights groups have separately warned that the glasses threaten the right to privacy, and countries such as Germany are reportedly considering a ban.
Meta's safety guidelines say smart glasses should not be used for harassment, infringing on privacy rights, or capturing sensitive information. Yet women have taken to social media to share stories of being filmed by men without their consent, and critics argue the technology inherently enables abuse. In a Guardian opinion video, columnist Kirsty Major says fears of surveillance and 'creepy men' mean Meta can never convince her to love the glasses — suggesting the company faces structural barriers to public acceptance regardless of its stated rules.